RAJNEESH KUMAR S/O INDER PAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/333/2025 · 2025-01-15
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35835 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35835 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 333/2025
1. Rajneesh Kumar S/o Inder Pal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 71 L.n.p. Post Office Ratanpura, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.) 335061
2. Krishan Kumar Saini S/o Net Ram Saini, Aged About 33 Years, R/o E-445, Iii B Khetri Nagar, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 333504
3. Uday Singh Meena S/o Rambharosi Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nai Meena Ka Pura, Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.) 321611
4. Sona D/o Jeevan Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o V.p.o. Pabusar, District Churu (Raj.) 331022.
5. Rajesh S/o Hari Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sheelgaon, District Nagaur (Raj.) 341028
6. Suman Meena D/o Gulab Chand Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o P 201 Mahal Road Rohini Nagar Jagatpura Teelawala, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) 302017 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan, Jaipur, 302005.
2. Director, Directorate Of Treasury And Accounts, Jyoti Nagar, Lalkothi Jaipur, 302007.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma through V.C For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 15/01/2025
(2 of 2) [CW-333/2025]
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the dictum encapsulated in
judgment passed by Coordinate Bench of the Court in SBCWP No.12726/2024 titled as Vikram Verma & Ors. vs. RSSB, wherein vide order dated 09.12.2024, respondents were directed to consider the representation filed by the petitioners. Therefore, while placing reliance upon the above cited,
learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant petition can be decided in light of the dictum passed in Vikram Verma (supra). Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition in light of the order passed in Vikram Verma (supra) and grants liberty to the petitioners to submit their representation before the appropriate authority. Further, respondents are directed to adjudicate the said representation within an upper limit of four weeks from the date of filing of representation, by way of a speaking order, following the principles of natural justice, and strictly in accordance with law and governing policies. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with the above said liberty being granted. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /50