NANJAPPA SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LRS SRI RAJAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/33360/2024 · 2025-03-19
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35834 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35834 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11718 WP No. 33360 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 33360 OF 2024 (SCST-) BETWEEN:
NANJAPPA SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LRS
1a. SRI RAJAMMA D/O NANJAPPA W/O JAYADEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT HULIKAL VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-561-101.
1b.
SMT. PUSHPALATHA D/O NANJAPPA, W/O GANGADHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT CHUNCHANAKUPPE VILLAGE, DODDAALADAMARA POST, BENGALURU NORTH-562-130.
1c.
1d.
SMT. SHARADHA D/O NANJAPPA W/O PARAMESH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT HASIRUVALLI VILLAGE, THYMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562-123.
SMT. KALA D/O NANJAPPA W/O SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT47 YEARS R/AT KAADASURU VILLAGE, DABBEGHATTA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK,
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11718 WP No. 33360 of 2024
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572227.
1e.. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT MADDANAHALLI, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-572-221
2.
SRI BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS S/O NANJAPPA RESIDING AT KAACHIHALLI, MAJIRE, MADDANAHALLI, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-572-221.
3.
SRI SHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT KAACHIHALLI, MAJIRE, MADDANAHALLI, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-572-221.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MURALI N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, M S BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TIPTUR SUB-DIVISION TUMKUR-572201.
3.
SRI. KEMPATHIMMAIAH S/O LATE NAGAISH AGE ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT ARISHINADAHALLI VILLAGE
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11718 WP No. 33360 of 2024
KASABA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-5720
5.
SRI. LAKSHMAIAH 5/O LATE NAGAIAH R/AT ARISHINADAHALLI VILLAGE.
KASABA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-57222
6.
SRI. NANJAPPA S/O LATE NAGAIAH R/AT ARISHINADAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-572227
7.
SRI. SIDDAPPA 5/O NAGAIAH R/AT ARISHINADAHALLI VILLAGE.
KASABA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR-572227.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK., AGA FOR R1 & R2 .,ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDE ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 08.07.2024 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN PTCLSR NO. 08/2020 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11718 WP No. 33360 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other Writ quashing the impugned order dated 08.07.2024 passed by the 2nd Respondent in PTCLSR No.08/2020 as per Annexure-A;
b. Call for the records in PTCLSR No.08/2020.
c. Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit considering the facts and circumstances of the above Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and equity.
2. A memo dated 19.3.2025 has been filed signed by the learned counsel for the Petitioners, which reads as under:-
Memo for withdrawal That the counsel for petitioners carves leaves of this Hon’ble Court to permit the petitioners to withdraw the present writ petition, reserving a liberty to approach the Deputy Commissioner and challenge the
order passed by the Asst Commissioner in PTCL SR No.08/2022. Memo in this regard may kindly be taken on record to meet the ends of justice.
3. Accepting the said memo and the submission of the
learned counsel for the Petitioners, there being an
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11718 WP No. 33360 of 2024
alternative and efficacious remedy available in terms of the appeal before the Deputy Commissioner.
4. Reserving such liberty, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
PRS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4