Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35833 (KAR)

PRAMOD KUMAR THAKUR v. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK

WP/32727/2024 · 2025-03-20

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11532 WP No. 32727 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 32727 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. PRAMOD KUMAR THAKUR FLAT NO. 404, DS-MAX STARRY V R LANE ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE 1 BANGALORE - 560105 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAMOD KUMAR THAKUR (PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND: 1. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS MD & CEO 763, ANNA SALAI CHENNAI - 600002 …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE IMPUGNED REGULATION NO.22 OF THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK (EMPLOYEES) PENSION REGULATIONS, 1995 AND DECLARE THE SAME AS Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11532 WP No. 32727 of 2024 UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENTLY DECLARE THE SAID PORTION OF THE REGULATION NULL AND VOID. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner-in-person files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "With due respect I the petitioner would like to withdraw this petition." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14