Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35830 (PNJ)

SUCHA SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CWP/15300/2003 · 2025-04-02

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 618 Sucha Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Ms. Shreya Kaushik, Advocate Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Abhishek Masih, Advocate for Mr. BS Patwalia, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the official respondents to treat the petit efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Learned counsel respondent stand 3. Disposed of, reserving the in case need arises 02.04.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15300 Date of Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Shreya Kaushik, Advocate and Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Abhishek Masih, Advocate for Mr. BS Patwalia, Advocate for respondent No.3. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for directing the official respondents to treat the petitioner as senior to respondent No.3, might not due to efflux of time, even be surviving. Learned counsel for the parties state that stand retired during pendency of the petition Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15300-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY and Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Abhishek Masih, Advocate for Mr. BS Patwalia, Advocate for respondent No.3. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the official ioner as senior to respondent No.3, might not due to for the parties state that both petitioner and private during pendency of the petition. petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition for directing the official ioner as senior to respondent No.3, might not due to both petitioner and private petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.03 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document