Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35830 (JHR)

PRAKASH ALIAS BADA ALIAS SHANKAR DEVGEOM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2693/2025 · 2025-09-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:30658] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2693 of 2025 ------ Prakash @ Bada @ Shankar Devgeom, aged about 26 years, son of Nandlal Devgeom, resident of Village Babudih, Near Hanuman Mandir, Dhirajganj, Post Sidgora, Police Station Sidgora, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-26-09-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 01.05.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 01.05.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner was directed to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks but due to inadvertence, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Advocate’s Clerk could not remove the said defects within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 for non- compliance of the peremptory order dated 01.05.2025. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 01.05.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list B.A. (Filing) No.1137 of 2025 before the appropriate Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 26.09.2025 Saroj/