- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2502 RFA No. 2556 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2556 OF 2023 (DEC) BETWEEN: MR MOHAMMED SAADATH @ SANTOSHA.M.P. S/O PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT RAHMATH MANZIL, NO.1346/G-8, 3RD CROSS, K.H.B.COLONY, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 032. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.NAVEED AHMED., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, KARNATAKA SECONDARY EDUCATION EXAMINATION BOARD, NEXT TO SIKSHAKARA SADANA, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 003. 3. THE KARNATAKA BOARD FOR SSLC BOARD, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, 6TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003. 4. THE SECRETARY (KSEEB), KARNATAKA SECONDARY EDUCATION EXAMINATION BOARD, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2502 RFA No. 2556 of 2023 6TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560 003. 5. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BHEEMANA GARDEN SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. 6. BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 030. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 (1) OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 10.01.2025, on that day, finally, two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2502 RFA No. 2556 of 2023 failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 21.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78