Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35822 (PNJ)

SANJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/15878/2025 · 2025-05-15

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-15878-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 210 AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-15878-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2025 SANJAY KUMAR ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok S. Chaudhary, Addl.AG, Haryana. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case FIR No.36 dated 12.11.2013 under Sections 420, 467, 471, 120-B of the IPC, registered at Police Station Anti Corruption Bureau, District Rohtak. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 27.03.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3. On instructions from Inspector-Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 27.03.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 15.05.2025 (H.S.GREWAL) renu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.05.16 09:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document