IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE PRESENT the HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 24P.S6 OF 201 SATTI Between: 1. P.Sattemma, D/o P.Veeraswamy, aged about 20 years. 2. P.Rupavathi, D/o P. Krishna, aged about 20 years 3. M.Narasamma. D/o M.Sanyasi. aged about 21 years. 4. K.Janaki, D/o K.Mutyala Rao. aged about 19 years 5. M.Prameela. D/o M.Chinnayya, aged about 21 years. 6. A.Kumari, D/o A.Gundaiah aged about 20 years. 7. B.Savitri, D/o Telungu aged about 19 years. 8. B.Gowri, D/o B.Koriya aged about 21 years. 9. S.Vasantha Kumari, D/o S.Simhachalam 10. G.Mangamma, D/o G.Demudu aged about 20 years. aged about 19 years. 11. K.Durga Bhavani, D/o K.Jaji Rao aged about 12. K.Suseela, D/o K.krishna aged about ‘ 13. V.Savithri. D/o V.Rama Rao aged about 14. M.Parvathi, D/o M.Appa Rao aged about 15. M.Sridevi, D/o M.Bojjanna aged about 21 16. V.Santhi, D/o V.Sanyasi aged about 17. A.Subhadra. D/o A.Bhagat Ram 18. A.Syamala Devi, D/o A.Venku Naidu 19. V.Poornima, D/o V.Buttu aged about 20. A.Kalavathi. D/o A.Jagannadham 21. M.Savithri, D/o M.Appa Rao. 19 years. 20 years. 21 years. 20 years. years. 21 years. aged about 21 years, aged about 20 years. 19 years, aged about 22 years, aged about 20 years. sLlam^parm, School of Nursing ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The Union of India, Ministry of Social Welfare Bhavan, New Delhi, rep.by its Secretary. as Empowerment, Sastry 2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, Government of Andhra 3rd Floor, Sankshema Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Nodal Agency) Social Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad. ^ ’ Pradesh, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue may a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 4 in not sanctioning the postmatric scholarships to the petitioners, who joined management quota from the academic year 2010-2011 onwards G.O.Ms.No. 90 dated 30.07.2002 which is in force as on the date of admission of the petitioners into General Nursing Midwifery Illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 the recommendations made by the Cabinet Sub-Committee in the meeting held on 09.12.2009 constituted under G.O.Rt.No. under as per. Course, as to take a decision on 4930, dated 12.10.2009. LA. NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 29857 OF 201. Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to release the petitioner as per G.O.Ms.No. Government of Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of the writ petition. praying that in the circumstances scholarships to the 90 dated 30.07.2002 issued by the r r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D L PANDU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI PASALA PONNA RAO (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) fhe Court made the following: ORDER APHC010019152013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 24?/^fi/?ni3 \ SATTI Between: P.sattemma, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Union Of India and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.D L PANDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.G RUKMINI (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT) 2.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) :: ORDER :: The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents 3 & 5 in not sanctioning the post-matric scholarships to the petitioners. The writ petition was admitted on 27.08.2013. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.L.Pandu, iearned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that by efflux of time writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 2. 3. , the cause in the 4. Given the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioners from availing the benefits, if any, as per their eligibility. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. Aoo.o N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGJStf^AR SECti //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri D L Pandu Advocate 2. Two CCs to GP for Social [OUT] 3. One CC to Smt. G Rukmini (SC for Central 4. One CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies [OPUC] Welfare, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Govt) Advocate [OPUC] Rao (Deputy Solicitor General of India) TF HIGH COURT DATED.07/05/2025 V ORDER ( ?2 JUI 2025 ^ . Current Section Ms^PATCWgV WP.No.24256of2013 mi CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS