SMT BHARTI VERMA WIFE OF DR. PRAHLAD RAM v. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CW/1207/2025 · 2025-02-17
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35814 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35814 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:6915] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1207/2025
1. Smt Bharti Verma Wife Of Dr. Prahlad Ram, Aged 48 Years, Resident Of 226A, Rameshwar Dham, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302013.
2. Dr. Prahlad Ram S/o Shri Late Shri Hanuman Prasad Ji, Aged 48 Years, Resident Of 226A, Rameshwar Dham, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 302013. ----Petitioners Versus
1. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur-II, First Floor, Mini Secretariat, Bani Park, Jaipur -
302016.
2. Shri Ganesh Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Rajkumar Agarwal, E-236, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Punjab National Bank, Through Its Authorised Officer, Office-Zonal Sastra Centre, 2 Nehru Place, Third Floor, Tonk Road, Jaipur- 302015.
4. Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited, Having Its Registered Office At F-3, Shriji Tower, C-99, First Floor, Subhash Nagar, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
5. Reserve Bank Of India, Through Authorised Officer, Situated At Rambagh Circle, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Naresh Vijay For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonal Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 17/02/2025 This writ petition is directed against the ad interim order dated 05.09.2024 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur Second, Jaipur in complaint No.470/2024 and its continuation on the premise that
[2025:RJ-JP:6915] (2 of 2) [CW-1207/2025] Sections 34 and 35 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 bar jurisdiction of the Consumer Court in the matter involved. However, the impugned order being ex parte ad interim order, this Court, instead of entertaining this writ petition on its merit, deems it just and proper to require the petitioners to approach the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum for redressal of their grievance by moving appropriate application(s). Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to approach the concerned learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum for redressal of their grievance. Needless to say that if any such application(s) is filed by the petitioners, same shall be decided by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in accordance with law expeditiously.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/33