UMME SALMA R VANTELLI W/O RAJMOHMMAD VANTELLI D/O SYED ROOP v. NEKRTC
WP/105021/2023 · 2025-03-19
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3581 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3581 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5026 WP No. 105021 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 105021 OF 2023 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
UMME SALMA R.VANTELLI W/O RAJMOHMMAD VANTELLI, D/O SYED ROOP, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: HOUSE NO.1209, HOSPET GALLI, NEAR MARKHANDESHWAR TEMPLE, WARD NO.04, ILKAL (RURAL), TQ: ILKAL AND DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN CODE-587 125.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANAND.R.KOLLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. NEKRTC, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SARIGE SADAN, MAIN ROAD, GULBARGA-585 102.
2. NEKRTC, THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, SIMPLINGANNA ROAD, KOPPAL DIVISION, KOPPAL-583 231.
… RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5026 WP No. 105021 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the petition was listed on 12.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on
19.03.2025.
The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 12.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 35