Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:43982 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Cr. R. (FC) No. 10/2025
Decided on: 15.12.2025
Vijay Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus
Advik & anr.
….Respondents
______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: None.
For the Respondents: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (oral)
Despite calling the matter repeatedly, no one has come forward to represent the petitioner. As per report of the registry as also submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents, the petitioner has not complied with the order passed on previous date including orders dated 21.3.2025, 10.11.2025 and 24.11.2025. 2
Considering non-representation of the petitioner and non-compliance of the orders passed by this Court, it
1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition. 3
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default as well as for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(Vivek Singh Thakur)
Judge
(Romesh Verma) 15.12.2025
Judge (pankaj)