IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2682 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.12.2025 __________________________________________________________________ Sh. Vinod Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Municipal Corporation, Dharamshala …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of instant execution petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for execution and implementation of judgment dated 12.08.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.12989 of 2025, whereby this Court passed the following order: “3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to file representation within one week, which in turn shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in light of Sheela Devi (supra) expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Ordered accordingly. In case, petitioner is found to be similarly situate to the petitioner in the aforesaid judgment, he would be extended similar benefits. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.” 2. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondent pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2 3. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondent, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of four weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of fair stand adopted by learned counsel representing respondent, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondent to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of four weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. December 30, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge