SMT. SIMA CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS v. SRI RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS
FAFOD/1760/2008 · 2025-04-21
Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:60414 Court No. - 48 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1760 of 2008 Appellant :- Smt. Sima Chaudhary And Others Respondent :- Sri Raj Kumar And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Anju Shukla,Nigamendra Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Arvind Kumar Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 291398 of 2008 Heard Sri Nigamendra Shukla, learned counsel for the claimants- appellants, Sri Achint Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for respondent no. 5/Insurance Company. No one is present on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4. This first appeal from order has been filed by the claimants- appellants for enhancement of compensation against the judgment and award dated 21.02.2006, passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court, Court No. 3, Meerut, in M.A.C.P. No. 105 of 2000 by which compensation of Rs. 4,89,500/- along with 6% interest has been awarded to the claimants-appellants. As per report of Stamp Reporter, there is delay of 2 years and 170 days in filing the present appeal. The claimants-appellants have failed to explain the aforesaid huge delay properly. No ground for delay condonation is made out. The delay condonation application is accordingly rejected.
Order on Memo of Appeal As the delay condonation application has been rejected, the appeal is dismissed being barred by time.
Order Date :- 22.4.2025 sailesh Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad