APHC010576532005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 67/2005 Between: 1. T.P. NAGARAJU, S/O PEDDANNA OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BERING NO. AP 02 V 3339, D.NO. 3-18-12, R.S. ROAD, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DIST. 2. A. VITTAL RAO KRUPA SANKER RAO, S/O A. N. VITTAL RAO OWNER OF THE SEIZED GAS CYLINDERS D.NO. 3-114-A, MUKKIDIPET, HINDUPUR, ANANTAPUR DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF A P REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this memorandum of Crl.R.C. against the Judgement dt. 30-7-2004 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Anantapur in Crl.A175/2000 confirming the confiscation order of the Joint Collector, Anantapur, dt. 27-12-1999 in RC.K3/10427/1995. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(CRLRCMP 73 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing certified copy of the order of the Joint Collector, Anantapur in RC.K3/10427/1995, dt. 27-12-1999 along with memo. of grounds of Crl.R.C. 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2005(CRLRCMP 95 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Judgement dt. 30-7-2004 in Crl.A. 175/2000 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Anantapur. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): P R BALARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: In spite of giving several opportunities and sufficient time, no information is received from the High Court of Telangana. The Office made an endorsement that the Criminal Revision Case was disposed of in the High Court of Telangana. 2. A team of staff was deputed to the High Court of Telangana by the Registrar General as per order of the Hon’ble the Chief Justice for physical verification of the records pertaining to this Court and to get the physical records if they are pending on the file of the High Court of Telangana. 3. The team deputed by this Court to the High Court of Telangana noticed that the Criminal Revision Case was disposed of in the High Court of Telangana itself. To that effect, the Registry submitted a note 3 that the physical bundle is not available and it was not received from the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. In view of the above, this Criminal Revision Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 02.07.2025 RSI 4 48 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.67 of 2005 Date: 02.07.2025 RSI