Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5819 of 2025 Vikas Yadav S/o Sundar Lal Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Arrigation Colony, Qr. No. BL01YH3 Shivani P.S. Champa District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.)
... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Urga, District- Korba (C.G.)
... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order On Board 13.08.2025
1. This is the first bail application filed u/s 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.59/2025 registered at Police Station Urga, District Korba (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1) & 103(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. As per the prosecution case, the applicant is alleged to have committed murder of Ram Singh Kanwar by assaulting him on the head with a sharp weapon in the midnight of 23.02.2025. The matter was reported to Police Station, Urga, District Korba Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2025.08.14 12:00:35 +0530
2 by complainant Jagdish Kanwar who is the son of the deceased, based on which, the applicant was arrested on
08.03.2025. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown person and on the memorandum statement of the applicant, he has been arrested. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 08.03.2025 and there is no likelihood of the trial to be concluded at the earliest, therefore, considering all these facts, the applicant may be released on bail. 4. State counsel, on the other hand, opposing the bail application submits that pursuant to the memorandum statement of the applicant, a sword has been seized from the applicant, FSL report is still awaited and considering the nature of offence, the applicant does not deserve to be released on bail. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the nature and gravity of offence and the material collected and available on record against the applicant, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands rejected. 8.
Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai