Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 14412 of 2025 Hemlal Ujir ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 23.05.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Party No.3 to modify his order dtd: 08.01.2018 under Annexure-5 and to regularize the service of the petitioner as a Regular Zilla Parishad Teacher on completion of six years of service instead of 8 years as Ganasikshyak and to grant him all consequential service and financial benefit within a stipulated period as deem fit and proper as his case is squarely covered by the decision of this Hon’ble Court in case of Bishnu Ch. Naik Vs. State of Odisha and others ( W.A. No.517 of 2024 disposed of on 18.03.2024) and Dhananjay Dey and Others; And/or pass any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions in the fitness of the case; And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.” Page 2 of 2. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. It is however observed that while taking decision relevancy and effect of the judgment passed by this Court in W.A. No.524 of 2024 and batch be taken into consideration. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Vacation Judge Jyoti