IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5563 of 2025 Date of Decision:12.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar & others …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. P.P.Chauhan & Ms. Shikha Rajta Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the respondent- State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record copy of office order dated 01.09.2025, issued by the Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that office orders issued by the Directorate from time to time on the analogy of CWPOA No.3435 of 2020, titled Satish Kumar and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others alongwith CWPOA No.6850 of 2020, titled Milat Ram and others vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others alongwith connected matters shall stand and office order No. EDN-H(2)B(2)3435/2020-CC passed by the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Department on dated 28.02.2025 & 10.04.2025 have become infructuous and are hereby withdrawn with immediate effect. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly same is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 12,2025 (shankar)