N.S.V.S. Ravi Kumar, v. The Director of Sugar & Cane Commissioner,
WP/32730/2012 · 2025-02-18
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35788 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35788 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010575542012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32730/2012 Between: N.s.v.s. Ravi Kumar, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Director Of Sugar Cane Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. BVSS BALAKRISHNA RANJIT Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V N NARAYANA RAO
2.
3. BATHINI RAVINDRA The Court made the following:
2
Order:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the respondents have not considered the petitioners’ representations dated
14.07.2012. The respondents have deputed the respondent Nos.4 to 11 as Field Man Area without following due process and without considering the petitioners’ representations.
2. There is no representation for the respondents, and no counter has been filed.
3. That apart, the petitioners have attained the age of superannuation during the pendency of the writ petition.
4. Considering the same, the grievance of the petitioners cannot be adjudicated on merits, as they have attained the age of superannuation.
5. With these observations, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 18.02.2025 PNS