IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 119 Gurmit Singh @ Gurmeet Singh Kamaljit Singh CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) 23.1.2025 (Annexure P Judge, Rupnagar whereby application filed by the petitioner for staying the proceedings of the impugned judgment dated 20.7.2023 (Annexure P Rupnagar has been dismissed. submits that the petitioner is not pressing the main relief sought in the present revision petition i.e. setting aside the order dated 23.1.2025 (Annexure P learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar to dispose of the appeal expeditiously. to para 7(c) (at page 8) of the petition, which reads as follows : CR-1750-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1750 of 2025 Date of decision : Gurmit Singh @ Gurmeet Singh Versus Kamaljit Singh CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Ashtasheel, Advocate for Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 23.1.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar whereby application filed by the petitioner for staying the proceedings of the impugned judgment dated 20.7.2023 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Rupnagar has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner is not pressing the main relief sought in the present revision petition i.e. setting aside the order dated 23.1.2025 (Annexure P-1), however, prays that a direction be issued to the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar to dispose of the appeal expeditiously. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to para 7(c) (at page 8) of the petition, which reads as follows : 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1750 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-10.07.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ashtasheel, Advocate for Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocate Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 1) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar whereby application filed by the petitioner for staying the proceedings of the impugned judgment dated 20.7.2023 2) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner is not pressing the main relief sought in the present revision petition i.e. setting aside the order dated 23.1.2025 r, prays that a direction be issued to the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar to dispose of the pending Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to para 7(c) (at page 8) of the petition, which reads as follows :- VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar year 2023, no ground to issue any direction to the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar for expeditious disposal of the made out. July 10, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CR-1750-2025 (O & M) “7(c) That it is a common practice and normally seen these days that once either of the party gets interim relief in his/her favour, then, such party prolongs the litigation by adopting all means. The plaintiff apprehends this from situation to happen in the appeal that has been preferred by the defendant before the learned first appellate court, who passed impugned order, so as to enjoy the possession of the plot in dispute till pendency of the appeal. The plaintiff, although, challenges the impugned order dated 23.01.2025 by terming it to be illegal on all aspects and at the same time, the plaintiff humbly submits that in case, the impugned order is upheld and in that situation, a direction be issued to the learned first appellate court to decide the main appeal, out of which impugned order has arisen, in a time bound manner that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit.” Heard. Keeping in view the fact that the appeal learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar year 2023, no ground to issue any direction to the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar for expeditious disposal of the made out. The revision petition stands dismissed Pending application(s), if any, s , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 That it is a common practice and normally seen these days that once either of the party gets interim relief in his/her favour, then, such party prolongs the litigation by adopting all means. The plaintiff apprehends this from situation to happen ppeal that has been preferred by the defendant before the learned first appellate court, who passed impugned order, so as to enjoy the possession of the plot in dispute till pendency of the appeal. The plaintiff, although, challenges the ed 23.01.2025 by terming it to be illegal on all aspects and at the same time, the plaintiff humbly submits that in case, the impugned order is upheld and in that situation, a direction be issued to the learned first appellate court to decide al, out of which impugned order has arisen, in a time bound manner that this Hon'ble Keeping in view the fact that the appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar has been filed only in the year 2023, no ground to issue any direction to the learned Additional District Judge, Rupnagar for expeditious disposal of the said appeal is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-1750-2025 (O & M) 3 VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.10 19.11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document