Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35784 (RAJ)

NARENDRA SINGH S/O YADRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16510/2024 · 2025-02-17

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6984] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16510/2024 Narendra Singh S/o Yadram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Dungapura, Police Station Balghat, District Gangapur City (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. Gov. Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.227/2024 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Gangapur City for the offences under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity. It is submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since his date of arrest. Learned counsel contends that further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:6984] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16510/2024] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that recovered contraband is less than commercial quantity; petitioner has no criminal antecedents; trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Narendra Singh S/o Yadram, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /139