177 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SHIV KUMAR MANPREET SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate with Mr. Vinod Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, D HARKESH MANUJA Compliance affidavit of Mr. Jaspreet Manager, Punjab Roadways, Jalandhar dated 25.03.2025 filed in Registry of this Court is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that speaking order has been passed and as such, he does not p petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, he would be at liberty to raise the quarter concerned within a which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shal two weeks thereafter a respondent, the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of Rs.50,000/- to 19.05.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SHIV KUMAR Versus MANPREET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate with Mr. Vinod Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Compliance affidavit of Mr. Jaspreet Manager, Punjab Roadways, Jalandhar-2 containing a speaking order dated 25.03.2025 filed in Registry of this Court is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that speaking order has been passed and as such, he does not p Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, would be at liberty to raise his claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay , the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of to petitioner from his/her own pocket. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1373-2025 Date of Decision: May 19, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate with Mr. Vinod Pundir, Advocate for the petitioner. AG, Punjab. Compliance affidavit of Mr. Jaspreet Singh, General 2 containing a speaking order dated 25.03.2025 filed in Registry of this Court is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that speaking order has been passed and as such, he does not press the present However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, claim by filing representation before of two weeks from today, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order l be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of nd in case of any delay on the part of , the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of from his/her own pocket. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2025 May 19, 2025 Singh, General 2 containing a speaking order Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that speaking ress the present However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, claim by filing representation before , which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order within a period of on the part of , the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.21 09:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document