Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35782 (AP)

BALAYOGINI SRI SRI SRI MANIKYESWARI MATHA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/30246/2024 · 2025-07-20

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010575582024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 30246 OF 2024 Between: 1. BALAYOGINI SRI SRI SRI MANIKYESWARI MATHA, SRI SUKA ASHRAMAM, A SOCIETY REGISTRED UNDER THE SOCIETIES ACT, 1860 WITH REGD. NO. 133/1987 AND HAVING ITS LOCATION AT JALAGANGA, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, BEING REP. BY ITS IN-CHARGE CHAIRMAN B.V.SIVA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 26-1-148, MAIN ROAD, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SRI BRAMARAMABHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BRAMARAMBHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BRAMARAMBHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. E CHANDRA SEKHARA REDDY, THE THEN IN-CHARGE EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SRI BRAMARAMABHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRI BRAMARAMABHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMIVARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SRI SRI SRI MAHAYOGINI ROOPARAHITHA AHIMSA YOGISHWARA VEERA DHARMARAJA MATHA, (SRI SRI SRI MANIKEYASWARA MATHA ASHRAMAM) REP. BY ITS MANAGER, SRISAILAM, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. SRI SHIVAIAH SWAMY, S/O. VENKAYYA SWAMI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. SURYANANDI, MANIKYAGIRI, YANAGUNDI VILLAGE, SEDAM TALUK, GULBARGA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 8. SRI K JAG JEEVAN REDDY, S/O. K. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. 18/4/738. ALIABAD, HYDERABAD. 9. SRI G GNANESHWAR, SRI G. GNANESHWAR, S/O. G. ESHWARAIAHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. PEDDA SHAPUR VILLAGE, SHAMSHABAD MANDAL, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT. 10. SRI HANUMANTH MADDI, S/O. MARAIAPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. YADGIRI, GULBARGA, KARNATAKA STATE. 11. SRI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, C/O. SURYANANDI, MANIKYAGIRI, YANAGUNDI VILLAGE, SEDAM TALUK, GULBARGA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 12. SRI BORRA NAGI REDDY, S/O. B. RANGA REDDY, R/O. DOOR NO.8-9-103/DN/155 WP, SAI GANESH NAGAR COLONY, K.V RANGA REDDY, KARMAN GHAT, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500 679. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTHA LEELA GANESH RAGHAVENDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY 2. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 30246 OF 2024 The Court made the following: Heard Sri Kotha Leela Ganesh Raghavendra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments and Sri T.Venu Gopal, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the action of the 4th respondent in issuing the proceedings dated 03.11.2024 granting permission in favour of respondent no.6 to construct a new building. The said proceedings have been challenged by the petitioner herein. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for admission, Sri T.Venu Gopal, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5 has placed before the court a copy of the proceedings in Rc.No.E2/5734/2024 dated 15.07.2025, issued by the 4th respondent. A perusal of the same would reflect that the impugned proceedings dated 03.11.2024 issued in favour of unofficial respondents have been withdrawn. 4. Having regard to the same, the relief sought in the writ petition does not survive. 5. The proceedings Rc.No.E2/5734/2024 dated 15.07.2025 issued by the 4th respondent are placed on record. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 21.07.2025 BSK 54 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 30246 OF 2024 Date: 21.07.2025 BSK