APHC010576782013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 32888/2013 Between: 1. M/S. SRI RAYALASEEMA HI-STRENGTH HYPO LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE & FACTORY AT GONDIPARLA VILLAGE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. T.G. BHARATH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. A P ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, A.P. SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MINT COMPOUND, HYDERABAD. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring (a) the order dated 12-03-2013 passed by the 1st respondent in O.P. No. 83/2012 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and without jurisdiction and (b) demand and collection of FSA charges relating to 2nd quarter of 2012-13 by the 2nd respondent by including FSA charges in the monthly bills of MArch, May 2013 as highly illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to Clauses 9 and 10 of the Regulation No. 45- B of the A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 1999 and consequently set aside the same and pass . IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 40903 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition by fixing an early date of hearing and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following ORDER: Sri V. Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel representing Sri D.V. Nagarjun Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same has rendered infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 10.07.2025 ikn 253 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 32888 OF 2013 Date: 10.07.2025 ikn