TILAK RAJ v. J AND K GRAMEEN BANK TH. ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1488/2024 · 2025-06-02
Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3578 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3578 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 1488/2024 CAV No. 402/2024
Tilak Raj ..... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate
Vs
J&K Grameen Bank & Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Sachin Dogra, Advocate Mr. Rahul Parihar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 02.06.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, as such, he wants to withdraw the instant petition. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
( SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA)
JUDGE
JUDGE
JAMMU 02.06.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 30 Mihul Singh 2025.06.03 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document