Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3578 (JK)

TILAK RAJ v. J AND K GRAMEEN BANK TH. ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER JAMMU AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1488/2024 · 2025-06-02

Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 1488/2024 CAV No. 402/2024 Tilak Raj ..... Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate Vs J&K Grameen Bank & Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Sachin Dogra, Advocate Mr. Rahul Parihar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE ORDER 02.06.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement, as such, he wants to withdraw the instant petition. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. ( SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE JAMMU 02.06.2025 Mihul Sr. No. 30 Mihul Singh 2025.06.03 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document