1 2025:CGHC:38224-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 778 of 2025 M/s Graceful Media Pvt. Ltd. Through its Director, Utkal Ranjan Purohit, S/o Shri Hrishikesh Purohit, Aged About 44 Years, Address - S.F. 22 To 24 Block A Geekay Milestone, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1. The Municipal Corporation Raipur Through Its Commissioner, White House, Near Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, District – Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Superintendent (Advertisement) The Municipal Corporation, Raipur, White House, Near Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, District – Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ...Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate. For Non-applicants : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 04.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel, appearing for the non-applicants. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.08.04 18:32:46 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has preferred the present MCC seeking modification of the order dated 25.06.2025 passed in WPC No. 3172 of 2025 on the ground that, during the course of hearing, this Court had granted simple interest on the refund amount of Rs. 4,89,000/-. However, the said direction was not recorded in the order, which may lead to a mistaken inference. 3. Learned counsel for the non-applicants submits that there is no error in the order passed by this Court in WPC No. 3172 of 2025. The order has been rightly passed and the directions therein are proper and warranted no interference. Hence, the present MCC/modification application is liable to be rejected. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents as well as the pleadings submitted by the applicant. 5. Upon due consideration, we find no illegality in the order passed by this Court. Based on the facts narrated in the writ petition and as reflected in the order dated 25.06.2025 passed in WPC No. 3172 of 2025, there appears to be no necessity to modify the said order. We do not find any good ground to interfere or modify the order, which is found to be absolutely justified in light of the reliefs sought by the petitioner. The relevant portion of the order dated 25.06.2025 is extracted hereinbelow: – “6. Since the tender in question was cancelled way back on 31.08.2023 and much water has flown thereafter, the only relief that the petitioner can be granted is that the respondents shall refund the 30% rent payment of Rs. 4,89,000/- made by the petitioner, 3 within a period of three weeks from today. It is ordered accordingly.” 6. In view of the aforesaid observations, the present MCC stands dismissed. 7. A copy of this order be placed in the record of WPC No. 3172 of 2025 and be read in conjunction with the order dated 25.06.2025 passed in the said writ petition. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan