APHC010576802024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30140/2024 Between: Shaik Masthan Vali and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TALLAPRAGADA SRIRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 3 at the instance of the 5th respondent, is repeatedly insisting the petitioners appear before the 3rd respondent police station and vacate and deliver their house in which the petitioners are residing. 2. It is submitted that the petitioners have filed O.S. No. 677 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, and the learned Judge has granted an injunction in their favour. It is also submitted IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30140/2024 Shaik Masthan Vali and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): TALLAPRAGADA SRIRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 3rd respondent, respondent, is repeatedly insisting the petitioners respondent police station and vacate and deliver their tioners are residing. It is submitted that the petitioners have filed O.S. No. 677 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, and the learned Judge has granted an injunction in their favour. It is also submitted IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) respondent, respondent, is repeatedly insisting the petitioners to respondent police station and vacate and deliver their It is submitted that the petitioners have filed O.S. No. 677 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, and the learned Judge has granted an injunction in their favour. It is also submitted 2 that the 5th respondent is also claiming the property over which the Court has granted the injunction. 3. Considering the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent not to disturb the peace of the petitioners and not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5th respondent. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 24.03.2025 PNS