- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14742-DB MFA No. 8759/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8759/2023 (FC) BETWEEN: T.ASHOK KUMAR S/O LATE SUBRAMANYA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.95, ‘KEERTHANA NILAYA’ N.M.C. ROAD, 2ND CROSS HOSAMANE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 301 …APPELLANT (BY SRI MADAN K S, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SMT. M.AMRUTHAVARSHINI W/O S ASHOK KUMAR AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT NO.264, 2ND MAIN 2ND CROSS, KAMALANAGARA BENGALURU – 560 079 … RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.11.2022 PASSED IN M.C.NO.4847/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(i-a) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by ROOPA R U Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14742-DB MFA No. 8759/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL) No representation for the appellant. Records show that on the previous hearing date also, the appellant’s Counsel has not appeared. Peremptory order dated 24.01.2025 is not complied. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal stood dismissed. Sd/- (K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14