Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35769 (AP)

N G Papa Rao, v. The Secretary to Government

WP/11212/2012 · 2025-04-03

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010577332012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11212/2012 Between: N G Papa Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The Secretary To Government and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GADE VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 2. K SWARNA SESHU The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent herein in returning the proposal for sanction of Rs.96,424/- towards medical reimbursement for the period 24.03.2007 to 28.06.2007 in respect of the petitioner herein as illegal, void and capricious and consequently set aside the Memo No.25569/D2/2011-3 dated 31.01.2012 of the 1st respondent herein by holding that the G.O.Ms.No.230 Finance (DCM-I) Department dated 15.10.2011 is not applicable to the said medical bills and direct the 1st respondent herein to sanction the aforesaid amount by granting relaxation to the petitioner herein.” 2 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. 3. On an earlier occasion, i.e., on 06.03.2025, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner in view of the death of the petitioner’s counsel. Accordingly, Registry sent notice to the petitioner and the same was unserved with an endorsement “Party refused-Return” on 02.04.2025. 4. In view of the same, it appears that the petitioner has not interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Dated: 03.04.2025 SNI 3 213 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO W.P.No.11212 of 2012 Date: 03.04.2025 SNI