M/S GRACEFUL MEDIA PVT. LTD. v. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RAIPUR
MCC/756/2025 · 2025-07-29
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35767 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35767 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 3
2025:CGHC:37129-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 756 of 2025 M/s Graceful Media Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director, Utkal Ranjan Purohit, S/o Shri Hrishikesh Purohit, Aged About 44 Years, Address- S.F.-22 To 24 Block A Geekay Milestone, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G.
... Petitioner versus 1 - The Municipal Corporation Raipur Through Its Commissioner, White House, Near Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Superintendent (Advertisement), The Municipal Corporation, Raipur, White House, Near Gandhi Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Shrijita Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 30/07/2025 SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.07.31 10:39:45 +0530
2 / 3
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner/applicant preferred the instant MCC for modification of the order dated 25-06-2025 passed in WPC No. 3161 of 2025 on the ground that during the course of hearing, the Court granted simple interest on the refund amount i.e. Rs.5,19,000/-, however, the same has not been recorded in the order passed by the Court and by which mistaken inference can be drawn.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that there is no error in the order passed by this Court in WPC No. 3161 of 2025. The said order has rightly been passed and the direction has rightly been given by this Court warranting no interference. Hence the instant MCC/ modification application may be rejected.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents as well as the pleadings of the applicant.
5. On due consideration, it is found that there is no illegality in the
order passed by this Court and as per the fact narrated in the writ petition as well as in the order passed by this Court in WPC No. 3161 of 2025, it appears that there is no need to modify the order passed by this Court. We do not find any good ground to interfere in the present matter to modify the order passed by this Court as the said order is absolutely justified to the prayer sought by the petitioner. The relevant part of the order dated 23/04/2025 is read as under :-
“6. Since the tender in question was cancelled way back on 31.08.2023 and much water has flown
3 / 3 thereafter, the only relief that the petitioner can be granted is that the respondents shall refund the 30% rent payment of Rs.5,19,000/- made by the petitioner, within a period of three weeks from today. It is ordered accordingly.”
6. With the aforesaid observation, the instant MCC stands dismissed.
7. Copy of this order be placed in the record of WPC No. 3161 of 2025 and further it be read along with the order dated 25/06/2025 passed in the said writ petition. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice $. Bhilwar/ Jyoti