[2025:RJ-JP:7633] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19096/2024 1. Krishan Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Shitla Prasad, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Tal Chiri, Dausa Rajasthan - 322240 2. Chandra Shekhar Shrimali Son Of Shri Jugal Kishore Shrimali, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Near Songiri Girls School, Songiri Kuwa, Bikaner 3. Azad Kumar Vyas Son Of Shri Aaskaran Vyas, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of D-632, Murlidhar Vyas Colony, Kala Kothi Ke Pass, Bikaner. 4. Gautam Kumar Sharma C/o. Raghunandan Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Bundi Ka Gothra, P.o. Gothra, Distt. Bundi, Rajasthan. 5. Babli Choudhary D/o. Shri Shiva Lal Choudhary, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Chatrapur, Post Baskripalnagar, Tehsil Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Through Its Director. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 700/2025 1. Sapna D/o Sh. Yashwant Singh Patil, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Shyampura, Malsar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 2. Priyanka Mahla D/o Sh. Ranveer, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Khajpur Purana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 3. Priyanka D/o Sh. Ramnath, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Gowla, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus [2025:RJ-JP:7633] (2 of 3) [CW-19096/2024] 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, State Institute Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Jhlana Doongi Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. Tarun Kumar Bairwa S/o Ramratan Bairwa, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Haidalpur, Taluk- Mahuva, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Suresh Gurjar S/o Rajaram Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, Village Gullana, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Dudi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Mr. Raul Verma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/02/2025 1. The present matter pertains to recruitment on the post of Nursing Officer in pursuance to the vacancies issued vide advertisement dated 05.05.2023. 2. Considering the identical factual narrative, legal issues, and with consent of the various counsel representing the matters, the present bunch of petitions are adjudicated vide this judgment wherein, Krishan Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19096/2024 is taken as the lead petition. It is made clear that the present [2025:RJ-JP:7633] (3 of 3) [CW-19096/2024] judgment shall be made applicable on mutatis mutandis basis on the petitions connected herein. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petitions are filed assailing the scheme of bonus marks and the decision order dated 08.07.2024 passed by Niti Nirdharan Committee. It is further submitted that the controversy pertains to grant of 15 bonus marks to CHA & CHO for the services that they have rendered during the period of pandemic of COVID-19. 4. Learned counsel has further apprised the Court with the fact that the lis/controversy in hand is no more res integra as the same is already adjudicated by judgments passed in SBCWP No.7898/2023 titled as Rahul Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and S.B. CWP No.18156/2022 titled as Ritesh Gochar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has contended that the judgment debtors of Rahul Singh Chauhan and Ors. (Supra) have assailed the said judgment and have preferred an appeal registered as Civil Appeal No.1422/2022 titled as Satya Dev Bhaugar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 8. Heard and considered. 9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court with the consensus of respective parties deems it apposite to dispose of the present batch of petitions in light of Rahul Singh (Supra). 10. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-178,319