Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3576 (UTT)

RAJAT SAINI ALIASAMOL DEEP v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/287/2025 · 2025-03-07

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1599 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528 No.287 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mrs. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Latwal, Brief Holder and Mr. Devender Singh, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. In this criminal misc. application under Section 528 B.N.S.S., applicant has sought quashing of order dated 07.01.2025 passed by learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Haridwar in Criminal Misc. Application No.739 of 2024. 3. It transpires that an F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant and one other person under Section 8, 22 & 60 of N.D.P.S. Act, with the contention that some NRX Buprenorphine Injections and Legesic Injections were recovered from the possession of the applicant and co- accused Rahul Kumar. According to the applicant, thereafter, his brother moved an application before the trial Court for bringing on record the mobile phone location data, CCTV footage of traffic police and CCTV footage of Police Station SIIDCUL. The said application has been dismissed by learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Haridwar vide order dated 07.01.2025. Thus, feeling aggrieved, applicant has approached this Court. 4. Perusal of the impugned order passed by learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Haridwar reveals that he 2025:UHC:1599 has considered & discussed all relevant aspects. Thus, the view taken by the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Haridwar cannot be faulted. Thus, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. 5. Accordingly, the criminal misc. application fails and is dismissed. (Alok Mahra, J.) 07.03.2025 Arpan