IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1776 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. SAGAR GAWAND @ SAGAR SURESH GAWAND SON OF SURESH BALKRISHNA GAWAND @ SURESH GAWAND RESIDENT OF ROOM NO. 1801, C-1 WING, SHRI LAKSHMI RESIDENCY, N.M. JOSHI MARG, BYCULLA WEST, MUMBAI - 400027 2. SURESH BALKRISHNA GAWAND @ SURESH GAWAND SON OF LATE BALKRISHNA GAWAND RESIDENT OF ROOM NO. 1801, C-1 WING, SHRI LAKSHMI RESIDENCY, N.M. JOSHI MARG, BYCULLA WEST, MUMBAI - 400027 3. KOMAL GAWAND @ KOMAL NIKHILESH ANAND DAUGHTER OF SURESH BALKRISHNA GAWAND @ SURESH GAWAND RESIDENT OF ROOM NO. 1801, C-1 WING, SHRI LAKSHMI RESIDENCY, N.M. JOSHI MARG, BYCULLA WEST, MUMBAI - 400027 ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. BHOLU TAANTI SON OF BHOLA TAANTI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BODHI TOLE, P.S. - BARHIYA, DISTRICT - LAKHISARAI ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Informant/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 13-02-2025 Heard Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh representing the informant as also Mr. Sadanand Paswan, learned Spl. P.P. 2. The present appeal has been preferred:- “is being filed u/s 14(A) of SC & ST (POA) Act for setting aside order dated 19.05.2023, by which ld. Additional Sessions Judge 1- cum- Spl Judge, Lakhisarai took cognizance for Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1776 of 2024(4) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 IPC and section 3(1)(r)(s) SC & ST (POA) Act against the appellants in connection with Complaint Case No. 18(C) of 2022.” 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants as also the complainant jointly submitted that good sense has prevailed between them and they want an amicable settlement. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant in continuation submits that a petition has been filed for the withdrawal of the complaint on 31.01.2025 but the stay order is hampering the movement of the case before the concerned Court. 5. Learned counsel for the appellants submit that in that background, he shall be withdrawing the petition to ensure that the positive steps that has been taken by the complainant comes to a logical conclusion. 6. Accepting the submissions of both the parties, the Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 1776 of 2024 as also Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. krishnakant/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T