HARJEET KAUR v. THE STATE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER CUM APPELLANT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS
CWP/7703/2025 · 2025-03-27
Arun Palli, Sudeepti Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35758 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35758 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7703-2025
Date of decision: 27.03.2025
Harjeet Kaur
….Petitioner Versus
The State Transport Commisioner-cum-Appellate Authority and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral)
With reference to the order dated 20.3.2025, passed by this Court, learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that Regional Transport Officer, Faridkot, has since been passed the necessary orders on 23.03.2025, whereby, claim of the petitioner has since been rejected. A copy of the said
order has been shared with us, which is retained on record as Mark x.
Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits, for the order (ibid) is appealable under Section 12 of the Punjab Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1924, he be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to avail the remedy of appeal.
Learned State counsel, as always, fairly submits that in the event any such appeal is preferred, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law.
As prayed, dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty prayed for.
(ARUN PALLI)
JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 27.03.2025 Ak Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
AMIT KUMAR 2025.03.28 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document