Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35756 (JHR)

FIROZ KHAN ALIAS LADDAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6233/2025 · 2025-11-04

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33039 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6233 of 2025 Firoz Khan @ Laddan Khan, aged about 43 years, S/o Akhatar Khan, Resident of N.H. Office, Naisarai Basti, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh Cantt., District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate Ms. Ruby Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------ 2/04.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S Case No. 349/2024, registered under section 22(b)/27(b)(ii) and 18(c) of the NDPS Act, pending in the Court of Sessions Judge, Ramgarh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the false allegations have been made against the petitioner of fleeing away from the spot leaving five boxes of Pentazocine Injection IP 30 mg/ml. By way of referring Annexure-2, he submits that the petitioner is suffering with polio in left leg disabled by 40% and the petitioner used to walk with the help of crutch. In view of this, he submits that the allegation of fleeing away is false. He then submits that the petitioner is a poor person and runs a grocery shop with the help of his mother in his house. He then submits that some altercation took place with the police and then the name of the petitioner has been implicated in this case. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits 2025:JHHC:33039 2 that the allegations are there of fleeing away leaving five boxes of Pentazocine Injection IP 30 mg/ml. 5. Annexure-2 is the document, which clearly suggests that the petitioner is disabled by 40 % and allegation is made that he fled away from the spot seeing the police. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh, in connection with Ramgarh P.S Case No. 349/2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 8. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 04.11.2025 R.Kumar