Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35751 (AP)

Rural Tribal Development Society, 4-34 v. The Government of India Rep., by its Secretary

WP/16874/2016 · 2025-08-29

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010574752016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16874/2016 Between: 1. RURAL TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, 4-34, CHOWDAMMA STREET, GOOTY ROAD, PATTIKONDA KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS PRESIDENT SMT.L.PREMALATH W/O. VINOD KUMAR, AGE 33 YEARS, R/O. ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. CHAITANYA RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, REGD. NO.158/93, UHC BHAGYANAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS PRESIDENT L.VINOD KUMAR, S/O. PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGE 40 YEARS R/O. 18-88-94 B, MAHABOOBNAGAR COLONY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT NATIONAL URBAN HEALTH MISSION, NEW DELHI. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. STATE HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SOCIETY ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD REP., BY ITS STATE PROGRAMME MANAGER DMHS CAMPUS, KOTI, HYDERABAD. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SULTAN BAZAR, 2 KOTI, HYDERABAD. 5. THE PROGRAMME MANAGER, NATIONAL URBAN HEALTH MISSION, HYDERABAD. 6. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE SOCIETY KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 7. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE SOCIETY ANANTAPURRAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 8. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, ANANTAPURRAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders passed by the respondent no.6 and 7 proceedings in Rc.No.NGO/UHC/KNL/2015, dated 16- 05-2016 and Rc.No.Spl/USP/DIO/DM&HO/ATP, dated 19-05-2016 for dispensing the services of NGOs operating Urban Health Centres and further directed that granting time duration of (15) days to vacate the premises and handover the equipment, furniture and staff to the respondent no.8 and 9 without assigning any reason as illegal, improper, unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to set aside the G.O.Ms.No.43 Dated 28-04-2016 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP 2107 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in WPMP.No. 20771 of 2016 in W.P.No. 16874 of 2016 dt: 26.05.2016 and dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 20771 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to continue the services of the petitioners NGOs with regard to the management 3 of the affairs of the urban primary health center allotted to the petitioner earlier by suspending impugned proceeding No. Rc. No. NGO/UHC/KNL/2015, dated 16-05-2016 and Rc. No. Spl/USP/DIO/DM & HO/ATP, dated 19-05-2016 issued by the respondent No. 6 and 7 in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Chaitanya Rural Development Society 2. Rural Tribal Development Society Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BETHAPALLI SURYANARAYANA (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) 3. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 4. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL 4 The Court made the following ORDER: On 14.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Thus, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the same, there is no appearance for the petitioners. 2. In view of continuous absence of the petitioners, it appears that they are not evincing any interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 30.08.2025 BSM 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.16874 of 2016 Date: 30.08.2025 BSM