Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35745 (JHR)

DINESH RANA ALIAS DINESH KUMAR RANA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6240/2025 · 2025-11-04

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33071 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6240 of 2025 Dinesh Rana @ Dinesh Kumar Rana, Aged about 26 years, Son of Bulaki Rana, resident of village-Makatpur, P.O-Kubri, P.S.-Dhanwar, District-Giridih, Jharkhand …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Harkhu Rana, aged about 57 years, Son of late Khosho Rana, Resident Village-Gajodih, P.O. + P.S- Birni District- Giridih, Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. ------ 2/04.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.2985 of 2023, registered under sections-498(A), 302, 201/34 of the Indian penal Code, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner happened to be husband of the daughter of informant, who died. He then submits that the wife of this petitioner has committed suicide and the funeral has taken place in presence of police. He then submits that the funeral was done after the post mortem was conducted. He further submits that the father of the deceased has given statement before the police that her daughter has lost her mental balance. He then submits that the FIR was not registered and after two months, the complaint case has been filed by the father of the deceased. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits 2025:JHHC:33071 2 that the case is arising out of complaint case. 5. In view of the above and considering that the post mortem was conducted and the funeral was done in presence of police and in the light of that, FIR was not registered. The complainant has made also statement before the police that her daughter has lost her mental balance and after two months, the complaint has been filed, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Giridih, in connection with Complaint Case No.2985 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 04.11.2025 R.Kumar