Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35744 (CHH)

Anand Singh Nayak v. State Of Chhattisgarh

ACQA/187/2017 · 2025-07-27

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 187 of 2017 Anand Singh Nayak S/o Lainu Singh Nayak Aged About 54 Years R/o Dhan Mandi Torwa, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Of Police Station Tumgaon, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Anand Baba S/o Dadu Nayak Aged About 28 Years R/o Bhatapara Tumgaon, Police Station Tumgaon, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Dadu Nayak S/o Sonu Ram Nayak Aged About 57 Years R/o Bhatapara Tumgaon, Police Station Tumgaon, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Uma Nayak W/o Dadu Nayak Aged About 52 Years R/o Bhatapara Tumgaon, Police Station Tumgaon, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Meera @ Neera Nayak W/o Narendra Nayak Aged About 32 Years R/o Bhatapara Tumgaon, Police Station Tumgaon, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, P.L. For Respondents No.2 to 5 : Mr. Shashwat Mishra, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal, Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.29 10:46:24 +0530 2 Judgment on Board 28/07/2025 1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE JUDGE Prashant