Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010573262008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.220 of 2008 Appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, aggrieved by the Decree dated 27.01.2003 passed in H.M.O.P.No.111 of 1997 on the file of the Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District. Between: K. Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. K. Bhupathi Reddy, Occ: Employee, R/o. D.No. 18-2-268/10/2, Ashok Nagar, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND N Renuka, W/o. K. Bhaskar Reddy, D/o.Thanigamalai Reddy, R/o.Big Street No.87, Tiruthani Town, Tamilnadu. ...Respondent/ Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri T S Anirudh Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Sri A Chandraih Naidu The Court made the following Judgment:
1 APHC010573262008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) m [3545] 0^^ WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA] NO: 220/2008 Between: 1.K. BHASKAR REDDY, S/O.K. BHUPATHI REDDY EMPLOYEE R/0.D.N0.18-2-268/10/2, ASHOK NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, ...APPELLANT AND 1.N RENUKA, W/o. K. Bhaskar Reddy D/o.Thanigamalai Reddy R/o.Big Street No.87 Tiruthani Town, Tamilnau ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 229 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 1583 days to prefer an apeal against the judgment dated 27.1.2003 passed in HMOP.No.111 of 1997 on the file of the Family Court cum V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi lA NO: 1 OF 2017(FCAMP 95 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix an early date of hering in FCA No.220/2008 Counsel for the Appellant:
1.TS ANIRUDH REDDY
2 Counsel for the Respondent:
1.ACHANDRAIH NAIDU The Court made the following: II i I; 1 It I I 1- H: I
3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.220 of 2008
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 13.08.2025, Sri G.Vijay Kumar, learned counsel represents that he is going to file vakalat on behalf of the appellant. But, as per the endorsement of the Registry, no such vakalat is filed. On 10.09.2025 also, there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore, the matter was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute this
2. Appeal. Accordingly, this Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
Sd/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. The Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati Chittoor District, (with records if any)
2. One CC to Sri T S Anirudh Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri A Chandraih Naidu, Advocate [OPUC]
4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. (to dispatch the trial court records)
5. Two CD Copies <5> TK sree
HIGH COURT DATED:17/09/2025 \ i
JUDGMENT FCA No.220 of 2008 x-s- , Curreni becuon . ■5;
DISMISSING THE FCA FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS