- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10800 WP No. 33373 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 33373 OF 2024 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: MR. GOPALA, AGE 43 YEARS, S/O. SIDDAPPA, M/S. SREE VIGNESHWARA JUICE AND CONDIMENTS, UNDER HT LINE, NEAR NTTF CIRCLE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BENGALURU-560 058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VICTOR MANOHARAN S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, 4TH FLOOR, KANIJA BHAVANA, EAST WING, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1, SRI. B.S. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS 19.07.2024 IS PRODUCED AS ANNX-B. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10800 WP No. 33373 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: "a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representations 19.07.2024 is produced as Annexure-B. b) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the fact of the case by allowing this writ petition in the interest of justice." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner taking this Court to the representation would seek to submit that petitioner is doing business in Bakery and eking his livelihood in the name `Sree Vigneshwara Juice and Condiments' for the last eight years. He is now sought to be evicted and therefore, he submitted a representation against such eviction. The representation is yet to be considered. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if reasonable time is granted, the representation would be - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10800 WP No. 33373 of 2024 considered and proper orders would be passed in accordance with law. 4. Therefore, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Till such time, the petitioner shall not be evicted from the business. Accordingly, Petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE bk List No.: 1 Sl No.: 190