IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 149 HARPREET KAUR AND ANTOHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the v submitted that the petitioner 12.03.2025 before the (Annexure P-5) but the same has not yet been considered and no action has He further submitted that at this stage, the appropriate directions are issued to Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali petitioners and take IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: HARPREET KAUR AND ANTOHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and to take action on dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on fore the Senior Superintendent ) raising their grievances as mentioned but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. SAS Nagar, Mohali to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2782 of 2025 Date of decision: 20.03.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation ery outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. petitioners would be satisfied if respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of decide the aforesaid representation filed by the of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on SAS Nagar, Mohali petition been taken thereon. satisfied if of decide the aforesaid representation filed by the Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2782 of 2025 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything o of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 20.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2782 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2782 of 2025 -2- Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without n the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document