Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35736 (PNJ)

ANAND v. DEEPAK BAGLA AND OTHERS

CR/1725/2025 · 2025-03-21

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 Anand Deepak Bagla and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) petitioner/defendant No.1 is that appeal against the order dated 09.1.2023 (Annexure P before the learned District & Sessions Judge, which is pending for the past two years. Vide order dated 09.1.2023, ad declined to the respondent/plaintiff. As such (Annexure P appeal is the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Co Choksi vs. Harish Ambalal Choksi and others 2025(2) RCR (Civil)74. CR-1725-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1725 of 2025 Date of decision : Versus Deepak Bagla and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sumit Sangwan, dvocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The short prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant No.1 is that appeal against the order dated 09.1.2023 (Annexure P-4) has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff before the learned District & Sessions Judge, which is pending for the past two years. Vide order dated 09.1.2023, ad declined to the respondent/plaintiff. As such (Annexure P-6), which is pending for the last two years. It is prayed that the petitioner will be satisfied if the said appeal is decided on merits without conducting mini trial in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Co Choksi vs. Harish Ambalal Choksi and others 2025(2) RCR . 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.1725 of 2025 Date of decision :-21.03.2025 ….Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sumit Sangwan, dvocate The short prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner/defendant No.1 is that appeal against the order dated 4) has been filed by the respondent/plaintiff before the learned District & Sessions Judge, which is pending for the past two years. Vide order dated 09.1.2023, ad-interim injunction was declined to the respondent/plaintiff. As such, he has filed the appeal 6), which is pending for the last two years. It is prayed that the petitioner will be satisfied if the said decided on merits without conducting mini trial in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ramakant Ambalal Choksi vs. Harish Ambalal Choksi and others 2025(2) RCR VIJAY ASIJA 2025.03.21 19.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document and find merit in the above said submission made on behalf of petitioner. direction to decide the appeal (Annexure P the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. March 21 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CR-1725-2025 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length and find merit in the above said submission made on behalf of petitioner. Accordingly, the present pe direction to learned Additional District Judge decide the appeal (Annexure P-6) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Pending application(s), if any, sha 21, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length and find merit in the above said submission made on behalf of the present petition is disposed of with a learned Additional District Judge-I, Charkhi Dadri to 6) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.03.21 19.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document