Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35725 (KAR)

M/S SCENIC BEAUTY HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. ANUPAMA DIXIT

CMP/552/2024 · 2025-02-28

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8812 CMP No. 552 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 552 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M/S. SCENIC BEAUTY HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT 552, 7TH MAIN ROAD, AGS LAYOUT, DOLLARS COLONY, R.M.V. 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 094, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, NALLAMUTHU THANGAVEL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. AKSHAY KUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE) AND: ANUPAMA DIXIT, W/O LTAE M.C.S. DIXIT, AGED MAJOR RESIDING AT NO. 27, SIMHADRI NILAYA 6TH CROSS, PUSHPAGIRINAGAR, KEREKODI, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 085. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ASHWIN K, ADVOCATE) THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 AND R/W RULE 2 OF SCHEME FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR BY KARNATAKA HIGH COURT. PRAYING TO (a) APPOINT A FIT AND PROPER PERSON AS THE SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE UPON THE DISPUTES AND DIFFERENCES THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT OUT OF OR Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8812 CMP No. 552 of 2024 IN CONNECTION WITH THE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATED 29.08.2021 EXECUTED BETWEEN BOTH THE AFORESAID PARTIES AT ANNEXURE-A IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLAUSE 27 OF THE AGREEMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The parties have filed a joint memorandum stating that the matter has been amicably settled out of court. In accordance with the terms of the joint memorandum, both parties request the Court to dispose of the proceedings accordingly. As a full and final settlement has been reached, the petitioner, who is present before the Court, acknowledges receipt of all dues. Since no dispute remains for consideration, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK CT: BHK