Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35722 (RAJ)

PRIYA JANU D/O VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19729/2024 · 2025-01-06

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:593] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19729/2024 1. Priya Janu D/o Vijay Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill. Charan Singh Nagar, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333026 (Raj.) 2. Sanjay Kumar Regar S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill. Khinyera, Teh. Loonkaranasar, Distt. Bikaner 334603 (Raj.) 3. Mohan Lal Gadwal S/o Murli Dhar Gadwal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo. Jaje Kalan, Teh. Shahpura, Distt. Jaipur 303103 (Raj.) 4. Santosh Kumar Meena S/o Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vill. Nayawas, Post Nangal Rajawatan, Teh. Ramgarh Pachwara, Distt. Dausa 303505 (Raj.) 5. Pradeep Karwasra S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo. Dotina, Teh. Jayal Vaya Degana, Distt. Nagaur 341503 (Raj.) 6. Hitesh Meena S/o Samandar Singh Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo. Salempur Khurd, Teh. Bhusawar, Distt. Bharatpur 321407 (Raj.) 7. Girdhari Singh S/o Bhur Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Modriya, Teh. Degana, District Nagaur. (Raj.) 341503. 8. Deepak Kumar Meghwal S/o Poonam Chandra, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 00, Village Achalpura, Meghwal Mohalla, Achalpura, Semarthali, Chhotisadri, Pratap Th. Chotisadari, District Pratapgarh, Raj., 312604. 9. Dhudi Lal Khorwal S/o Panchu Ram Rajgar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Kela Ka Bas, Post Behlod, District Jaipur, Raj, 303120. 10. Khemraj Meena S/o Ramcharan Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Chandera, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa, Raj., 303509. 11. Pooja D/o Yogendra Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Nehru Nagar, Hiradaas, District Bharatpur, Raj., 321001. 12. Harsan Kumar S/o Jora Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vijay Nagar Ramseen, Distt. Jalore 307803 (Raj.) 13. Dinesh Kumar Jwala S/o Omprakash Raigar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Malpura Road, Dudu, District Jaipur, Raj., [2025:RJ-JP:593] (2 of 3) [CW-19729/2024] 303008. 14. Suraj Kumar Kilania S/o Shishpal Kilania, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No.02, Dundlod, District Jhunjhunu, Raj., 333702. 15. Ravindra Kumar Regar S/o Prabhu Lal Regar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Bindhya Bhata, Tehsil Jahazpur, District Bhilwara, Raj., 311201. 16. Rajesh Sharma S/o Satya Narayan Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o A-163, Goverdhan Nagar, Toll Tax Tonk Road, District Jaipur, Raj., 302033. 17. Lalit Kumar S/o Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Near 100, Number Railway Gate, Subhash Nagar, Merta Road, District Nagaur, Raj., 341511. 18. Rahul Dubga S/o Govind Dubga, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Behind Anathalaya, Vivek Nagar, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Raj., 334001. 19. Virendra Swami S/o Rajendra Swami, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhani Bhadura Singh Wali Lisariya, Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Raj., 332712. 20. Raj Kumar Khichar S/o Mool Chand Khichar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vill. Majipura, Post Barsinghpura Via Palsana, Teh. Dantaramgarh, Distt. Sikar 332402 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan, Jaipur, 302005. 2. Director, Directorate Of Treasury And Accounts, Jyoti Nagar, Lalkothi Jaipur, 302007. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN [2025:RJ-JP:593] (3 of 3) [CW-19729/2024] Order 06/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners while placing reliance upon S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.12726/2024 & 12073/2024 has submitted that the instant matter is no more res integra, as the same is already adjudicated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.12726/2024 & 12073/2024 (supra), wherein the petitions were disposed of with categorical directions to the respondents to consider the representation filed by the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the instant petition in light of the ratio held in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.12726/2024 & 12073/2024 (supra). Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/21