Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35717 (ALL)

SMT. REKHA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

NA529/756/2025 · 2025-04-08

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51758 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 756 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Rekha Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Thakur Prasad Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Sessions Trial No. 92 of 2009 in case crime no. 733 of 2008 under Sections 323/34, 302/34, 352, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Mugra Badshahpur, District-Jaunpur pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-II, Jaunpur) expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the injured in this case. The sessions trial relates to the year 2009 and since long it is pending at the stage of final argument but however, the learned trial Court is avoiding to hear final argument in this matter. It is further submitted that in the meantime an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was moved before the Court but no interim order has been passed by the Hon'ble High Court. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It appears from perusal of the record that the said sessions trial is pending for final argument since the year 2021 but no argument has been heard so far by the learned trial Court. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to hear the argument and make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, keeping in view the work load of that Court and also the cooperation rendered by the applicant of this case, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad