[2025:RJ-JP:4686] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16509/2024 Jaipal @ Jaisingh S/o Hukam Singh, R/o Village Parehi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 03/02/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.181/2024 registered with the Police Station, Jurhara, District Deeg for offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of IPC and Section 66 D of Information Technology Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 4. On perusal of the averments made in the F.I.R., the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name is found to be in pictures during the investigation, which is continuing under the provisions of Section 173 Cr.P.C. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, the probability of false [2025:RJ-JP:4686] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16509/2024] implications of the petitioner, cannot be ruled out. 6. Taking into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances as stated above, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg in F.I.R. No. 181/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /32