BACHAN SINGH BAIRWA S/O SHRI GOVINDRAM @ GOVINDA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16498/2024 · 2025-01-30
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35710 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35710 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4278] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 16498/2024 Bachan Singh Bairwa S/o Shri Govindram @ Govinda, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Khankhar, Police Station Kherli, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Ms. Renu Verma, for Mr. Satish Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 30/01/2025
1. This second bail application is filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 145/2024, registered at Police Station Kherli, District Alwar for offences punishable u/S 143, 323, 341, 307, 504 of IPC.
2. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn vide
order dated 22.08.2024.
3. Heard.
4. Considered.
5. On consideration of the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and perusal of the averments made in the FIR lodged by the injured witness Kamal Singh, there are specific allegations against the accused petitioner of causing injuries to the deceased.
[2025:RJ-JP:4278] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16498/2024]
6. There are specific allegations against the co-accused of causing injuries to the deceased and his bail application No. 10343/2024 has already been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 22.08.2024.
7. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the counsel for the complainant and in view of the specific allegations against the accused petitioner of causing injuries to the deceased and his incarceration of less than one year, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
8. Accordingly, this second bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /343