Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35710 (CHH)

KU. HINA PATRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3815/2025 · 2025-07-21

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:34797 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3815 of 2025 1 - Ku. Hina Patre D/o Jitendra Kumar Patre Aged About 12 Years Minor Represented Through Father And Legal Guardian Jitendra Kumar Patre S/o Indra Kumar Patre, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village- Pitaura, P.S. And Tahsil- Nandani Nagar (Ahiwara, District- Durg (C.G.) 2 - Ku. Lawanya Patre D/o Jitendra Kumar Patre Aged About 10 Years Minor Represented Through Father And Legal Guardian Jitendra Kumar Patre S/o Indra Kumar Patre, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village- Pitaura, P.S. And Tahsil- Nandani Nagar (Ahiwara, District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Ku. Aradhya Patre D/o Jitendra Kumar Patre Aged About 7 Years Minor Represented Through Father And Legal Guardian Jitendra Kumar Patre S/o Indra Kumar Patre, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village- Pitaura, P.S. And Tahsil- Nandani Nagar (Ahiwara, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Pendra, District- Gourela, Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 2 - The District Education Officer District- Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 3 - The Block Education Officer Pendra, District- Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 4 - The Headmaster Govt. Pre-Middle Abhyas School, Amarpur, Block- Pendra, District- Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 5 - The Headmaster Govt. Girls Primary School, Amarpur, Block- Pendra, District- Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Jyoti Patre (Agrawal) Ex- W/o Jitendra Kumar Patre (Now Vishal Agrawal), R/o Near Durga Chowk, Opposite Pooja Talkies, Pendra, District- Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) ----Respondents 2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 22/07/2025 1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present Writ Petition, with liberty to file a duly constituted fresh petition. 2. As prayed for, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 3. All Annexures annexed in the present writ petition be returned back after obtaining photocopy. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti