[2025:RJ-JP:1709] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2292/2024 1. Madhu Saini D/o Hoti Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 2. Vivek Saini S/o Ailam Chand Saini, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kaman Gate, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Deeg. 4. The Sho, Police Station Kotwali Deeg, District Deeg. 5. Hoti Lal Saini S/o Jhaman Lal, Residing At Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 6. Chhelbihari @ Kannu S/o Hoti Lal, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 7. Laxminarayan @ Bholi S/o Hoti Lal, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 8. Brijlata W/o Hoti Lal, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 9. Mahesh S/o Padam Saini, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 10. Mukesh S/o Padam Saini, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 11. Premraj Saini S/o Jhamman Lal Saini, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 12. Pintu Saini S/o Premraj Saini, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). 13. Yogesh S/o Premraj Saini, R/o Near Cinema Hall, Kaman Gate, Deeg, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh Bikarwar, Adv. Mrs. Madhu Saini with Mr. Vivek Saini (petitioners in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. [2025:RJ-JP:1709] (2 of 3) [CRLW-2292/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 10/01/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry are waived. 2. Petitioners are present in person and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent(s) as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are major and have solemnized marriage on their own free will. Copy of marriage certificate dated 11.12.2024 has been annexed with the writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but family members and relatives who are respondent Nos.5 to 13 are not happy with their marriage. It is further submitted that the petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, therefore, they should be protected. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Deeg and respondent No.2 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of. [2025:RJ-JP:1709] (3 of 3) [CRLW-2292/2024] 7. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /523