Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35707 (CHH)

LAXMI NARAYAN SAHU v. MEENA SAHU

CRR/982/2023 · 2025-07-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36503 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 982 of 2023 Laxmi Narayan Sahu S/o Late Shyam Lal Sahu, Aged About 40 Years Permanently R/o Village Kosmarra, Police Station Bhakhara, Tashil Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh, Present Address Sangharsh Nagar Near Chandramari Road, Bhadarwadi Nagpurp.S. Wadora, District Nagapur (M.H.) (Wrongly Mentioned In Chhattisgarh Of The Final Order In Learned Family Court Dhamtari) ... Applicant versus 1 - Meena Sahu W/o Laxmi Narayan Sahu, Aged About 37 Years R/o Kushmarra (Matrimonial Home), R/o Village Bagdehi, Post Dahi, P.S. Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 2 - Taniya Sahu Aged About 16 Years Guardian Through Mother Smt. Meena Sahu, R/o Village Bagdehi, Post Dahi, P.S. Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 3 - Tejeshwari Sahu Aged About 11 Years, Guardian Through Mother Smt. Meena Sahu, R/o Village Bagdehi, Post Dahi, P.S. Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 28.07 .202 5 . RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision and be placed to make an order to set-aside the impugned order dated 01.08.2023 (Annexure A/ 1) and until the disposal of the revision the operation and effect of the learned Family Court Dhamtari be ordered to be stayed and the separate application is being filed on the purpose of the grant of stay to the impugned order passed by the learned Family Court, Dhamtari, in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order as well as original records be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan