(201) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8982-2004 (O&M) Date of decision:- 14.05.2025 Akshay Kumar ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Haryana and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. * * * * SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the cause of non-grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner stands redressed by an order of appointment dated 11.04.2005, whereby the petitioner was granted compassionate appointment on the post of Peon on account of his father, who was working on the post of Patwari in 2002, having died in harness. 2. In view of the above, the grievance having been redressed, no cause survives. 3. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 14.05.2025 Amodh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMODH SHARMA 2025.05.15 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement